Understanding Cooling Concept Assessment for Better High-Power Step-Down Conversion
                    
                    
                    In an era where autonomous driving is the next big thing for all   automotive OEMs, the number of electronic control units (ECUs) within a   vehicle has dramatically increased in recent years, covering various   applications such as driver assist cameras and data fusion. Their   respective power consumption has also increased. Depending on the   application and the scope of operation, the output power of the   pre-regulator can range from the single-digit watt range for a park   assist ECU, whereas for a data fusion ECU to one hundred watts or more.
 

 
Figure 1. Image of a PCB with a Heat Sink on the Top-Side
 
An extensive series of tests based on a 100 W buck converter determined the impact of the heat sink, its size, and its position on   the MOSFETs junction temperature. The measurements also include a   comparison between MOSFETs with an exposed pad on the bottom side versus   MOSFETs with an exposed pad on the top side, a so-called “top cool” package.
 
Benefits of Top-Side Cooling Technology for PCB Design
 
Top-side cooling technology is an effective solution that offers several   benefits for PCB design besides its critical impact on thermal   management:
 
• Better Mechanical Stability
 
Top-side cooling technology offers better mechanical stability than   traditional bottom-side cooling techniques. Attaching the heat sink   directly to the top of the power semiconductor components significantly   reduces the risk of mechanical stress or damage, which results in   improved reliability and a longer lifespan of the components.
 
• Improved EMI Performance
 
Top-side cooling technology offers improved EMI performance compared to   traditional bottom-side cooling techniques. By reducing the amount of   electrical noise generated by the power semiconductor components,   top-side cooling technology helps to ensure compliance with EMI and EMC   standards.
 
• More Compact Design
 
Top-side cooling technology allows for a more compact design than air   cooling, which requires additional space for fans or other cooling   devices. By eliminating the need for additional cooling components,   top-side cooling technology reduces the overall size and weight of the   system, which is critical for automotive applications where space is   often limited.
 
In real-world applications, where the PCB area is limited with less   copper area, most of the heat generated would escape from the housing of   the ECU. Top cool packages are the right fit for such conditions, with   an exposed pad on top making direct contact with the housing. Most of   the heat flows from the top side, and a moderate amount of heat flows   from the bottom side through the PCB, which does not make the PCB warmer   as otherwise seen on the traditional bottom-side exposed pad package.   Enabling heat flow from both sides improves the PCB lifetime and extends   system reliability.
 
 
 
Figure 2. Illustrations of PCB Cooling Methods
 
The 100 W buck converter board is optimized with a larger area of copper   in all layers, without significant difference in thermal performance   between top and bottom-side exposed pad packages. But it is a good   indication to show the importance of the PCB layout and obtain   remarkable thermal performance without any expensive cooling systems.
 
The measurement results are shown in clearly arranged graphical   comparisons and can be surprising. Of course, this test setup is far   from an actual application, such as a power supply as part of a complex   ECU inside a custom aluminum housing with cooling fins. However, it   explains the impact of the different parameters, like the heat sink’s   thermal resistance or gap pad thickness, on the MOSFET temperature.   Also, It shows clearly that either mounting the heat sink on top of the   heat source (the MOSFETs in this case) or the other side of the PCB can   achieve similar performance. This presumes the PCB layout is thermally   optimized with thermal vias and larger copper areas on all layers to   allow thermal flow through the PCB. MOSFETs with a top-side exposed pad   should connect to a heat sink to minimize heat flows into the PCB.
 
 
 
Figure 3. Graph of Measurements of LS MOSFET Temperature with Top-side Heat Sink
 
Please refer to our new white paper: Cooling Concept Assessment for High Power Step Down Conversion.   It conveys the underlying significance of using a heat sink to reduce   thermal stress on electronic devices and the dependency of system   thermal performance on various factors, such as the position and size of   the heat sink.
 
Improved Thermal Management Performance
 
Effective thermal management is critical for high-power step-down   conversions in automotive applications. Traditional bottom-side cooling   techniques have limitations, and new solutions are required as power   densities continue to increase.
 
Top-side cooling provides a more direct thermal path for heat   dissipation, which allows for better heat transfer from the power   semiconductor components to the heat sink. This results in lower   operating temperatures and improved efficiency, critical for high-power   step-down conversions in automotive applications. Top-side cooling   technology can provide up to 70% improvement in thermal performance   compared to traditional bottom-side cooling techniques. This is due to   the more direct thermal path provided by top-side cooling, which allows   for better heat transfer and dissipation.
 
The paper clearly explains the test setup, loss calculations in the   MOSFETs to set the expectations from the measurements, and measurement   data from 10 mm, 25 mm, and 60 mm height heat sinks. It is fascinating   to see how the fin height of the heat sink has an impact on thermal   resistance. In real-world applications, even the heat sink height is   considered carefully per the space availability and cost. Additionally,   testing gap pads with different thermal resistance show the impact of   heat transfer from the heat source to the heat sink. Around 30°C   temperature difference is seen on MOSFETs without heat sink compared to   those with heat sink; different heat sinks and load currents reveal   similar noticeable differences. Measurement results align well with the   theoretical expectations. Factors like cost, space availability, and   plenty of others play a role in selecting the right cooling system.
 
Learn more about our products and solutions for step-down conversion or cooling assessment:
 
• Automotive Pre-Regulator Reference Design and Evaluation Board Overview
• Top Cool MOSFETs